Andreas Peglau interviews the AI assistant from OPEN AI.
A Thought Experiment from July 27, 2026 (translated by OPEN AI).
Preliminary Remarks
During their lifetimes, Marx and Engels generally behaved in a rather intolerant manner towards divergent viewpoints. Nevertheless, the abrupt shift in perspective that OPEN AI attributes to them in the following is not entirely unfounded. In his later years, Marx turned his attention intensively to ethnological literature and thus to issues extending beyond economics. And in 1893, ten years after Marx’s death, Engels acknowledged that they had neglected, in the “derivation of political, legal and other ideological concepts, and of the actions mediated by these concepts […] the manner in which these concepts etc. come about”. So why shouldn’t Marx and Engels, having just been brought back to life, throw themselves full of enthusiasm into new tasks and information – including the knowledge about psychosocial interrelationships that has since been accumulated?
Anyone who obtains information from an AI should double-check every source, every quotation, and every core statement – and will often find that errors are present. However, through a series of interactions with OPEN AI, it has also become equally clear to me: where a wealth of accessible, reputable information exists regarding complex matters – as is the case with the theories of Marx and Engels – and I am simultaneously competent enough to judge the AI’s responses, knowledge can be synthesised in a fascinating manner. I do not even have to share the „opinion“ of the AI to benefit from it: it provides me with exciting starting points for my own further reflections. Weiterlesen




